Communication Chaos: Nearly Half of Malpractice Claims Cite Miscommunication

In a system as complex as healthcare, mistakes are inevitable—but what’s shocking is how many of them start with something as simple (and as fixable) as a conversation.

According to data cited by TigerConnect, 49% of all medical malpractice claims involve a breakdown in communication. That’s nearly half of all lawsuits stemming from something left unsaid, misunderstood, or misrouted. It’s not just between clinicians. It’s also between doctors and patients—and the financial and human consequences are massive.

The Anatomy of Miscommunication

The report breaks the failures down into two categories:

  • 53% of communication-related malpractice cases stem from provider–patient interactions
    These include missed explanations, unclear instructions, or failure to set expectations.

  • 47% stem from provider–provider handoffs
    Think: shift changes, cross-specialty consults, or delayed lab result notifications.

And while these may sound like everyday lapses, the price tag isn’t minor. The average communication-related malpractice claim costs $237,000.

Why the Problem Persists

Communication issues persist for a few reasons:

  1. Fragmented Systems:
    Most hospitals still rely on a patchwork of EHRs, pagers, phone calls, and faxes to coordinate care. That leaves plenty of room for error.

  2. Time Pressures:
    Clinicians are stretched thin. The average primary care visit is under 18 minutes. Handoffs are often rushed. Chart notes get skimmed.

  3. Assumed Understanding:
    Clinicians often assume the patient or the next provider “gets it.” That assumption is dangerous.

  4. Lack of Training:
    Communication is still under-emphasized in clinical education. Providers are trained to diagnose and treat—not always to explain or listen.

What This Means for Healthcare Leaders

If you’re a hospital executive, medical director, or risk manager, this should be a wake-up call: communication isn’t soft skills—it’s patient safety infrastructure.

That means investing in:

  • Standardized handoff protocols like SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation)

  • Integrated communication tools that unify chat, alerts, and records across teams

  • Training programs focused on empathetic, clear, repeatable communication with patients

It’s not about adding more technology. It’s about reducing the number of places where things can get lost in translation.

The ROI of Clarity

Beyond the ethical and clinical case, the business case is clear:
Cutting down communication failures reduces legal exposure, boosts patient satisfaction, and improves throughput. And as care gets more distributed—across teams, time zones, and care settings—clarity is the only cure for chaos.

Final Thought

We often think of malpractice as the result of technical failure. But in nearly half of cases, the failure was verbal. Healthcare doesn't need more apps. It needs more alignment—between teams, between settings, and above all, between people.

Previous
Previous

Misplaced Words, Misplaced Care: Communication Failures Causing $1.7 B in Malpractice Costs

Next
Next

Chaos by Cost: Why 70% of Employers Are Scrambling to Rethink Health Benefits